> >> If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n: > >> > >> drivers/mfd/max14577.c:177: warning: ‘max14577_suspend’ defined but not > >> used > >> drivers/mfd/max14577.c:200: warning: ‘max14577_resume’ defined but not used > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/max14577.c | 2 ++ > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max14577.c b/drivers/mfd/max14577.c > >> index ac514fb2b877..71aa14a6bfbb 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mfd/max14577.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max14577.c > >> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id max14577_i2c_id[] = { > >> }; > >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max14577_i2c_id); > >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> static int max14577_suspend(struct device *dev) > >> { > >> struct i2c_client *i2c = container_of(dev, struct i2c_client, dev); > >> @@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ static int max14577_resume(struct device *dev) > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */ > >> > >> static struct of_device_id max14577_dt_match[] = { > >> { .compatible = "maxim,max14577", }, > > > > Same here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1615513/focus=1615563 > > although I don't mind if your patch comes in :). > > Sorry, missed those. > It's a pity these known fixes don't go in together with the code that > introduces > them...
Great idea. Can I borrow your time machine? ;) Or, we can use the -rcs, as this is what they were designed for. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
