On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:03 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Now that there has been a full release of the kernel, and all users
> of %n have been dropped, switch to %n use triggering a BUG. Ignoring
> arguments could be used to assist in information leaks if an arbitrary
> format string was under the control of an attacker.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> @@ -1735,15 +1735,12 @@ int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char 
> *fmt, va_list args)
>               case FORMAT_TYPE_NRCHARS: {
>                       /*
>                        * Since %n poses a greater security risk than
> -                      * utility, ignore %n and skip its argument.
> +                      * utility, it should not be implemented. Instead,
> +                      * BUG when encountering %n, since there are no
> +                      * legitimate users and skipping arguments could
> +                      * assist information leak attacks.
>                        */
> -                     void *skip_arg;
> -
> -                     WARN_ONCE(1, "Please remove ignored %%n in '%s'\n",
> -                                     old_fmt);
> -
> -                     skip_arg = va_arg(args, void *);
> -                     break;
> +                     BUG();

BUGs should be avoided where possible.

I think using BUG here isn't necessary or good.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to