* Ren Qiaowei <qiaowei....@intel.com> wrote:
> >> MPX kernel code, namely this patchset, has mainly the 2
> >> responsibilities: provide handlers for bounds faults (#BR), and
> >> manage bounds memory.
> >
> > AFAICS the kernel side implementation causes no runtime overhead
> > for non-MPX workloads, and also causes no runtime overhead for
> > non-MPX hardware, right?
>
> Yes.
Actually, I think that's not entirely true.
For example if within the same mm there's a lot of non-MPX threads and
an MPX thread, then the MMU notifier will be called for MMU operations
of every non-MPX thread as well!
So MPX state of a thread will slow down all the other non-MPX threads
as well.
The statement is only true for non-MPX tasks that have their separate
mm's that does not have a single MPX thread.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
