Am 28.01.2014 18:35, schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote: >> >> Hmm, my gdb does not like that notion. >> >> (gdb) list schedule+0x45 >> Function "schedule+0x45" not defined. > > I don't have a debug build, so maybe it's something specific to gdb > actually seeing type information and then being confused.. > > Can you do "x/10i schedule+0x45" because that definitely works for me. > But I literally detest DBUG_INFO builds, because it's useless crap. > 99% of everything I debug is from people reporting problems on their > kernels, so it's not like my local debug info would match that anyway.
x/10i schedule+0x45 works. > Anyway, if it's a type information thing due to DEBUG_INFO that > confuses gdb and makes it think that the "+0x45" part doesn't make > sense, you may need to add a cast to get gdb to ignore the type > information. IOW, does > > list (void *)schedule + 0x45 > > work for you? Nope. (gdb) list (void *)schedule + 0x45 Function "(void *)schedule + 0x45" not defined. > I happen to have gdb-7.6.50 here that I tested with, but I've used > "symbol+offset" forever afaik, so it's definitely not something new. I'm on 7.5.1. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
