On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:32:32 -0500
Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:50:43PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>  > Are you running as root?  If not, you found another way to get perf to 
> start function tracing.
> 
> Good point. In this case, I was trying some new experimental trinity code
> that starts as root, generates fd's, then drops privs before doing syscalls.
> 
> So the "generate fds" part did some perf_event_open's as root, yeah.
> 
> While that's less scary from a security pov than it was last time, it's still
> something that aparently needs fixing.
> 

OK, then I'm not as worried (phew!). But you are correct, this needs to
be fixed. How do I run just perf commands from trinity? I do not think
this occurs from any other systemcall needing to be run.

Peter, Jiri,

Although we fixed the bug that let a normal user enable function
tracing from perf, we never figured out why perf screws up the function
tracing filter accounting. That will happen if you either use a
uninitialized ftrace hash, or modify the hash without using the ftrace
API. If it is the latter, it is probably done by some kind of use after
free.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to