On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Eric, did you try this when writing 207205a2ba26 ("kthread: NUMA aware
> > kthread_create_on_node()") or was it always numa_node_id() from the
> > beginning?
>
> Hmm, I think I did not try this, its absolutely possible NUMA_NO_NODE
> was better here.
>
Nishanth, could you change your patch to just return NUMA_NO_NODE for the
non-kthreadd case?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
