Hello, On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > I'm not sure if this is part of a larger patchset actually adding that > "system_power_efficient_wq", but maybe it'd be better to expose a > function as an API rather than the wq struct? > > Something like > > scheduled_delayed_work_pwr_efficient(...)?
While there are some benefits to using dedicated functions for specific workqueues, I don't think it brings enough benefits to justify adding dedicated API and am unlikely to add new ones. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
