On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> That said, regardless of the allocation issue, I do think that it's
> stupid for kernel_fpu_{begin,end} to save the math state if
> "used_math" was not set. So I do think__kernel_fpu_end() as-s is
> buggy and stupid.
For eager_fpu case, assumption was every task should always have
'used_math' set. But i think there is a race, where we drop the fpu
explicitly by doing drop_fpu() and meanwhile if we get an interrupt
etc that ends up using fpu?
so I will Ack for option "b", as option "a" breaks the features which
don't take into account cr0.TS.
Meanwhile I have the patch removing the delayed dynamic allocation for
non-eager fpu. will post it after some testing.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
