Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While it is not clear what form the final soft real time > implementation is, we should complete the partial implementation of > SCHED_ISO that is in 2.6.11-rc2-mm1.
I finally had a chance to try this today. I applied a slightly different patch (2.6.11-rc2-iso3.diff) on top of patch-2.6.11-rc2. I tried to use 2.6.11-rc2-mm2, but could not due to conflicts with other scheduler updates. It is not clear whether the realtime threads are running in the new scheduler class. Checking with schedtool yields odd results. (Before, my old schedtool always said "POLICY I: SCHED_ISO".) [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack_test/ $ pst jackd 2173 2173 TS - 0 19 0 0.0 SLs rt_sigsuspend jackd 2174 2174 ? 21 0 60 0 0.0 SL - jackd 2175 2175 TS - 0 23 0 0.0 SL rt_sigsuspend jackd 2176 2176 TS - 0 23 0 0.0 SL - jackd 2177 2177 ? 20 0 59 0 0.0 SL syscall_call jackd 2178 2178 ? 10 0 49 0 1.7 SL - jackd [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack_test/ $ schedtool 2174 2176 2177 2178 PID 2174: PRIO 21, POLICY (null) , NICE 0 PID 2176: PRIO 0, POLICY N: SCHED_NORMAL, NICE 0 PID 2177: PRIO 20, POLICY (null) , NICE 0 PID 2178: PRIO 10, POLICY (null) , NICE 0 The results of the first run indicate something is badly wrong. It is quite possible that I got confused and messed up the build somehow. http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso3/jack_test3-2.6.11-rc2-q1-200501311225.log http://www.joq.us/jack/benchmarks/sched-iso3/jack_test3-2.6.11-rc2-q1-200501311225.png Loading the realtime-lsm and then running with SCHED_FIFO *does* work as expected on this kernel. I should retry the test with *exactly* the expected patch sequence. What would that be? -- joq - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
