Commit c65c1877bd68 ("slub: use lockdep_assert_held") incorrectly required
that add_full() and remove_full() hold n->list_lock. The lock is only
taken when kmem_cache_debug(s), since that's the only time it actually
does anything.
Require that the lock only be taken under such a condition.
Reported-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1004,21 +1004,19 @@ static inline void slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
void *x)
static void add_full(struct kmem_cache *s,
struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct page *page)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
-
if (!(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
return;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
list_add(&page->lru, &n->full);
}
static void remove_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
struct page *page)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
-
if (!(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
return;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&n->list_lock);
list_del(&page->lru);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
