On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:58 AM,  <kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> To use spin_{un}lock_irq is dangerous if caller disabled interrupt.
> spin_lock_irqsave is a safer alternative. Luckily, now there is no
> caller that has such usage but it would be nice to fix.
>
> Reported-by: David Rientjes rient...@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>

Self Nack this. There IS a caller and we should send this to stable.
I'll respin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to