Hi Grant, Boris: (BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc, and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring).
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia > > <[email protected]> wrote: [..] > >> > >> Maybe we can discuss about it now? > >> > >> nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength. > >> nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength. > > I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable. > > That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the > nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then. > Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding, I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it... > I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing > these OF helpers. > ... and then you can base on it? This is the original patchset: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763 -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
