On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2014 07:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@ti.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2014 04:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@ti.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch provides bindings for the 64-bit timer in the KeyStone
>>>>> architecture devices. The timer can be configured as a general-purpose
>>>>> 64-bit
>>>>> timer, dual general-purpose 32-bit timers. When configured as dual
>>>>> 32-bit
>>>>> timers, each half can operate in conjunction (chain mode) or
>>>>> independently
>>>>> (unchained mode) of each other.
>>>>
>>>> This is software configurable or h/w design time configurations?
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>> This is h/w design time configurations
>>
>> Then it seems like the binding should provide for describing those
>> differences either with a property or different compatible strings.
>>
>> Rob
>
> Oh..sorry, seems I didn't catch, this is configurable by software.
> These configurations are like modes in which timer can work
> and they are not different hardware IPs. It depends on driver in
> which mode it should work.

In that case,

Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to