On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:10:01AM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again: > > > > > > drivers/sh/Makefile | 6 > > > drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile | 7 + > > > drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway-sysfs.c | 45 ++++++ > > > drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway.c | 201 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/superhyway.h | 79 ++++++++++++ > > > 5 files changed, 338 insertions(+) > > > > Sorry for taking so long on this. I've added it to my trees and it will > > show up in the next -mm releases. After 2.6.11 is out I'll forward it > > on to Linus. > > > There's an older version of this patch currently still in -mm, so this > patch won't actually apply there directly. I can send an incremental -mm > patch that gets the current -mm implementation up to date with these > changes (or if Andrew can back out the current patch in -mm and apply this > one in place, that works too).
If Andrew could just drop the patch in his tree, he will get this version in through the bk-drivers tree that he pulls into the -mm releases. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/