On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:10:01AM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > Yes, it would seem that way. Here we go again:
> > > 
> > >  drivers/sh/Makefile                      |    6 
> > >  drivers/sh/superhyway/Makefile           |    7 +
> > >  drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway-sysfs.c |   45 ++++++
> > >  drivers/sh/superhyway/superhyway.c       |  201 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/superhyway.h               |   79 ++++++++++++
> > >  5 files changed, 338 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Sorry for taking so long on this.  I've added it to my trees and it will
> > show up in the next -mm releases.  After 2.6.11 is out I'll forward it
> > on to Linus.
> > 
> There's an older version of this patch currently still in -mm, so this
> patch won't actually apply there directly. I can send an incremental -mm
> patch that gets the current -mm implementation up to date with these
> changes (or if Andrew can back out the current patch in -mm and apply this
> one in place, that works too).

If Andrew could just drop the patch in his tree, he will get this
version in through the bk-drivers tree that he pulls into the -mm
releases.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to