3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>

commit 64590daa9e0dfb3aad89e3ab9230683b76211d5b upstream.

Both nfs41_walk_client_list and nfs40_walk_client_list expect the
'status' variable to be set to the value -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID
if the loop fails to find a match.
The problem is that the 'pos->cl_cons_state > NFS_CS_READY' changes
the value of 'status', and sets it either to the value '0' (which
indicates success), or to the value EINTR.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4client.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
@@ -491,9 +491,10 @@ int nfs40_walk_client_list(struct nfs_cl
                        prev = pos;
 
                        status = nfs_wait_client_init_complete(pos);
-                       spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
                        if (status < 0)
-                               continue;
+                               goto out;
+                       status = -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID;
+                       spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
                }
                if (pos->cl_cons_state != NFS_CS_READY)
                        continue;
@@ -631,7 +632,8 @@ int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_cl
                        }
                        spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
                        if (status < 0)
-                               continue;
+                               break;
+                       status = -NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID;
                }
                if (pos->cl_cons_state != NFS_CS_READY)
                        continue;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to