Hi!
> >> > Sorry for being late responding to this, but I'd say this is a
> >> prime > example for typedef's considered evil (see Greg's OLS talk
> >> ;).
> >> >
> >> > It would be a lot cleaner if it was made a struct and then
> >> passing a > struct pointer as the argument instead of passing the
> >> struct by value > as you do right now.
> >>
> >> Sorry, can't do that. That would require flag day and change
> >> everything at once. That is just not feasible. When things are
> >> settled, it is okay to change it to struct passed by value.. It is
> >> small anyway and at least we will not have problems with freeing it
> >> etc.
>
> Pavel> Well, we could switch to passing struct by reference
>
> Pavel> (typedef struct pm_message *pm_message_t)
>
> Pavel> , but AFAICS it would only bring us problems with lifetime
> Pavel> rules etc. Lets not do it. Pavel
>
> This way you end up hiding what is really going on, the very problem
> of using typedefs. If the change is really needed why not get it right
> in the first go?
Because it is impossible?
[You can't change all drivers at once in incompatible way. See
previous discussion, about half a year ago.]
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
