On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:58:46AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Okay, you are right, restoring it unconditionaly would be bad
> > > idea. Still it would be nice to tell cpufreq governor "please change
> > > the frequency ASAP" so it does not run at 800MHz for half an hour
> > > compiling kernels on AC power.
> >
> > It already does that... or at least it should. in cpufreq_resume() there is
> > a call to schedule_work(&cpu_policy->update); which will cause a call
> > cpufreq_update_policy() in due course. And cpufreq_update_policy() calls the
> > governor, and it is supposed to adjust the frequency to the user's wish
> > then.
>
> Ok, so Rafael's suspend() routine seems like good fix...
No. I don't see a reason why my desktop P4 should drop to 12.5 frequency
(p4-clockmod) if I ask it to suspend to mem.
Dominik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
