Em Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:30:18AM +0000, Will Deacon escreveu: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:27:44AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This needs to go via the perf tree to avoid a repeat of the mess last > > > time.
> > If the tooling bits are fine with Arnaldo then I have no objections > > either - once all the bits are acked please send a single series with > > all 4(?) patches in it, for tip:perf/core inclusion. > I think it's just 1 patch -- the other 3 are under arch/arm64, so it would > be easier to take those via the arm64 tree and deal with any conflicts > there. I don't have a problem with arch specific bits, that don't touch the tools at all, going thru the respective arch git tree. Jiri, can you see anything problematic in this? From a quick look I couldn't. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
