On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Not that your implementation is bad or anything but the patch itself > somehow makes me cringe a bit. It's probably just because it has to > add to the already overly complicated offline path. Guaranteeing > strict offline ordering might be a good idea but at least for the > immediate bug fix, I agree that the memcg specific fix seems better > suited. Let's apply that one and reconsider this one if it turns out > we do need strict offline reordering.
Yes, I agree completely - thanks. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
