On 02/07/2014 07:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this > information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the > cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the > idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The > idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu > won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle. > > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <[email protected]> -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
