Hi, On 02/13/2014 05:40 PM, Andrey Tsyvarev wrote: > Hi, > >> BTW, have you tested the case that added remove_dirty_dir_inode() into the >> fail path >> of init_inode_metadata? >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c >> index e095a4f..d5a2c9e 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c >> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ put_error: >> /* once the failed inode becomes a bad inode, i_mode is S_IFREG */ >> truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); >> truncate_blocks(inode, 0); >> + remove_dirty_dir_inode(inode); >> error: >> remove_inode_page(inode); >> return ERR_PTR(err); > Yes, i have tested that case. Fail in init_inode_metadata has been processed > correctly. Thanks.
If no other regressions, maybe you can send out the fix patch about this issue.:) Thanks, Gu > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
