On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:11 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 03 of February 2005 07:38, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > Are you seriously proposing this for 2.6.11?? > > > > Well... There should be no problem with > > add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch and > > update-aty128fb-sleep-wakeup-code-for-new-powermac-changes.patch. > > > > radeonfb is another story, but the newer patch is definitely less > > invasive. It really just fixes bugs and adds the bulk of PM stuff to > > wakeup the newer chips, plus some backlight changes. It's been tested by > > pmac users for a while, the only reason I sent it to you only recently > > is that i was away for a month ! > ,,backlight changes'' - that interests me. My ibook g4 1.2GHz right now can > sleep and wake up sometimes (with additional patch) but the backlight doesn't > turn on or is very, very dark and I can't make it lighter from keyboard. Is > this change related to such problems?
Yes. Please let me know if the patch makes it better. > Generic question - how does suspend to ram/suspend to disk looks for ibook g4 > in current Linus and mm kernels? suspend-to-ram should work with this radeonfb patch. > > I'm hesitating about having it in 2.6.11 tho due to linus wanting to > > release real soon, I'd rather have a bit more non-ppc testing just in > > case though... but now it depends entirely on when linus plans to get > > 2.6.11 out of the door. > > > > Ben. > -- Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
