On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 15:02 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Note that the comment in this Kconfig file (that is also removed) > > suggests to first remove the select statements for these symbols and > > then the symbols themselves. But I think it makes more sense to first > > delete these three symbols and then remove the selects statements (as > > that is removing a second order effect). But it could just as well be > > done with just one patch, I'd say. > > There's a simple reason for not getting rid of the symbols first. > Doing it that way, as you did, leaves a window in which it's possible > to select a non-existent symbol. If that's not an error, it ought to > be.
It is silently ignored. I've contemplated diving in the kconfig code to see whether doing that could be made to trigger an error or, perhaps better, a warning. I've not made up my mind yet. It's trivial to merge these two patches, though. So feel free to ask me to do that. > Regardless, for both patches: > > Acked-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> Thanks. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
