On Sunday, February 16, 2014 06:08:05 PM Paul Bolle wrote: > Nothing cares about ACPI_PROCFS.
Some defconfigs set it. Care to remove it from them too? > This has been the case since v2.6.38. > This Kconfig symbol serves no purpose and its help text is now > misleading. It can safely be removed. If this symbol would be needed > again in the future it can be readded in a commit that adds code that > actually uses it. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]> > --- > Tested with "git grep" only. > > Michael Opdenacker did a previous attempt in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/27/15 . That patch that needed some > context changes, so I redid it. I also wrote a new commit explanation. > It also addresses the reasons not to accept Michael's patch. > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 13 ------------- > 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > index 4770de5..436111b 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > @@ -43,19 +43,6 @@ config ACPI_SLEEP > depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION > default y > > -config ACPI_PROCFS > - bool "Deprecated /proc/acpi files" > - depends on PROC_FS > - help > - For backwards compatibility, this option allows > - deprecated /proc/acpi/ files to exist, even when > - they have been replaced by functions in /sys. > - > - This option has no effect on /proc/acpi/ files > - and functions which do not yet exist in /sys. > - > - Say N to delete /proc/acpi/ files that have moved to /sys/ > - > config ACPI_EC_DEBUGFS > tristate "EC read/write access through /sys/kernel/debug/ec" > default n > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
