On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 19:23 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:47:29AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 06:08:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > > Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > Thank you all, queued for 3.15. > > > > We should also have some facility for moving the SRCU workqueues to > > housekeeping/timekeeping kthreads in the NO_HZ_FULL case. Or does > > this patch already have that effect? > > Kevin Hilman and me plan to try to bring a new Kconfig option that could let > us control the unbound workqueues affinity through sysfs.
Handing control to the user seemed like a fine thing, so I started making a boot option to enable it. Forcing WQ_SYSFS on at sysfs decision spot doesn't go well, init order matters :) Post init frobbing required if you want to see/frob all unbound. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/