On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 16:25 -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:32:13PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 14:02 -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > > index 434fda3..dcc67cd 100644 > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > > > @@ -364,6 +364,12 @@ config PPC_PERF_CTRS > > > help > > > This enables the powerpc-specific perf_event back-end. > > > > > > +config HV_PERF_CTRS > > > + def_bool y > > > + depends on PERF_EVENTS && PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT > > > + help > > > + Enable access to perf counters provided by the hypervisor > > > > Please don't add default-y stuff that is platform-specific, and > > definitely point out that platform dependency in the config description > > -- I have to look elsewhere in the patchset to determine that this is > > for "Power Hypervisor". PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT is enabled by all 6xx > > builds, even for hardware like e300 that doesn't have PMU at all (it has > > the FSL embedded perfmon instead), much less this hv interface. > > > > And yes, PPC_PERF_CTRS has the same problem and should be fixed. :-) > > Yep, I just based this one on what PPC_PERF_CTRS was doing. > > How about the following: > > +config HV_PERF_CTRS > + bool "Perf Hypervisor supplied counters"
"Support for Hypervisor supplied PMU events (24x7 & GPCI)" ? > + default y > + depends on PERF_EVENTS && PPC_HAVE_PMU_SUPPORT && PPC_PSERIES I think you just want: depends on PERF_EVENTS && PPC_PSERIES Because you're adding two completely new PMUs, they're not a "struct power_pmu" backend for the existing powerpc PMU implementation. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/