On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
acpi_check_dsm() interface.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi Maarten,
Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether
this patch fixes the regression?
Thanks!
Gerry
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
index 4ef83df..c6c7d0d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
@@ -106,6 +106,29 @@ static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int
func, int arg, uint32_t *
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * On some platforms, _DSM(nouveau_op_dsm_muid, func0) has special
+ * requirements on the fourth parameter, so a private implementation
+ * instead of using acpi_check_dsm().
+ */
+static int nouveau_check_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ int result;
+
+ /*
+ * Function 0 returns a Buffer containing available functions.
+ * The args parameter is ignored for function 0, so just put 0 in it
+ */
+ if (nouveau_optimus_dsm(handle, 0, 0, &result)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * ACPI Spec v4 9.14.1: if bit 0 is zero, no function is supported.
+ * If the n-th bit is enabled, function n is supported
+ */
+ return result & 1 && result & (1 << NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS);
+}
+
static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -207,8 +230,7 @@ static int nouveau_dsm_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev)
1 << NOUVEAU_DSM_POWER))
retval |= NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_MUX;
- if (acpi_check_dsm(dhandle, nouveau_op_dsm_muid, 0x00000100,
- 1 << NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS))
+ if (nouveau_check_optimus_dsm(dhandle))
retval |= NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT;
if (retval & NOUVEAU_DSM_HAS_OPT) {
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
