On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:54:18AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:31:42PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 1: vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms : Ok
> > 2: detect open syscall event : Ok
> > 3: detect open syscall event on all cpus : Ok
> > 4: read samples using the mmap interface : Ok
> > 5: parse events tests : Warning:
> > function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> > Warning: function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> > Warning: function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> > Warning: bad op token {
> > Warning: bad op token {
> > Warning: bad op token {
> > Warning: bad op token {
> > Warning: function is_writable_pte not defined
> > Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> > Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> > Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> > Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> > Warning: unknown op '->'
> > Warning: function jiffies_to_msecs not defined
> > Warning: function jiffies_to_msecs not defined
> > Warning: unknown op '{'
> > Warning: unknown op '{'
> > Ok
> > 6: x86 rdpmc test : Ok
> > 7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields : Ok
> > 8: Test perf pmu format parsing : Ok
> > 9: Test dso data interface : Ok
> > 10: roundtrip evsel->name check : Ok
> > 11: Check parsing of sched tracepoints fields : Ok
> > 12: Generate and check syscalls:sys_enter_open event fields: Ok
> > 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : Ok
> > 14: Test matching and linking multiple hists : Ok
> > 15: Try 'use perf' in python, checking link problems : FAILED!
whats the perf version, from rpm/sources?
> > 16: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok
> > 17: Test breakpoint overflow sampling : Ok
> > 18: Test number of exit event of a simple workload : Ok
> > 19: Test software clock events have valid period values : Ok
> > 20: Test converting perf time to TSC : Ok
> > 21: Test object code reading : FAILED!
> > 22: Test sample parsing : Ok
> > 23: Test using a dummy software event to keep tracking : Ok
> > 24: Test parsing with no sample_id_all bit set : Ok
> >
> >
> > I see '5' failing in similar ways in 3.13 too, so it's been broken
> > for a while.
test 5 just emits warnings due to parsing tracepoint formats
it's *almost* cured by traceevents plugins support, which
got in just recently
>
> We'll have to ask acme and jolsa, I'm sure I've never looked at that
> before.
>
> > Is 21 due to CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE perhaps ?
21 could fail due to objdump disassebly issue
---
The test fails because of the objdump bug (feature?). I'm getting
following disassembly output:
objdump -z -d --start-address=0xffffffff815cf06e
--stop-address=0xffffffff815cf0ee
/usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/3.10.0-80.el7perf_test21_1.x86_64/vmlinux
ffffffff815cf06e <sysret_check+0x4b>:
ffffffff815cf06e: 24 2f and $0x2f,%al
ffffffff815cf070: 00 0f add %cl,(%rdi)
ffffffff815cf071 <sysret_careful>:
ffffffff815cf071: 0f ba e2 03 bt $0x3,%edx
ffffffff815cf075: 73 11 jae ffffffff815cf088
<sysret_signal>
Notice the address '*70:' displaying 2 bytes, while the output
continues with address '*71:'
The perf test 21 reads bytes dump from this output and compares it
to the bytes read from the file in a standard way. This check fails
because of the extra byte being read from the objdump output.
---
there's already BZ filled (internal one)
> > Might that also explain why perf top isn't showing me kernel
> > function names any more ?
>
> There were some KASLR fails, but I thought most of those were cured, I
> think Adrian was involved.
right, I tested those changes and worked for me
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
