On S�nndag 06 Februar 2005 04:26, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Abstract most manual mask checks of cpu_features with cpu_has_feature() > � Just to get back to the point of consistant naming: In case we do the other proposed changes as well, is everyone happy with the following function names?
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_X) cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features & CPU_FTR_X
cpu_feature_possible(CPU_FTR_X) CPU_FTR_POSSIBLE_MASK & CPU_FTR_X
fw_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_X) cur_cpu_spec->fw_features & FW_FTR_X
platform_is(PLATFORM_X) systemcfg->platform == PLATFORM_X
platform_possible(PLATFORM_X) PLATFORM_POSSIBLE_MASK & PLATFORM_X
platform_compatible(PLATFORM_X) systemcfg->platform & PLATFORM_X
It's not as consistant as I'd like it to be, but it's the best I could
come up with.
Arnd <><
pgpsjS2HQdlNt.pgp
Description: signature
