On Thu, Feb 03, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.1992.2.73, 2005/02/02 08:48:23-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [PATCH] Bug in tty_io.c after changes between 2.6.9-rc1-bk1 and > 2.6.9-rc1-bk2 > > Fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3736 > > Finally located that a problem seems to be a simple typo. > > Acked-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > tty_io.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > diff -Nru a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c > --- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c 2005-02-02 10:45:08 -08:00 > +++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c 2005-02-02 10:45:08 -08:00 > @@ -1156,8 +1156,8 @@ > int i = index + driver->name_base; > /* ->name is initialized to "ttyp", but "tty" is expected */ > sprintf(p, "%s%c%x", > - driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_SLAVE ? "tty" : > driver->name, > - ptychar[i >> 4 & 0xf], i & 0xf); > + driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_SLAVE ? "pty" : driver->name, > + ptychar[i >> 4 & 0xf], i & 0xf); > }
This change looks very bogus, what are you trying to fix here? if pty_driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER, a node ptyXY has to be created. if pty_driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_SLAVE, a node ttyXY has to be created. See Documentation/devices.txt, line 108ff and 183ff With your change, the ttyXY becomes ptyXY? Why does that fix anything? Do you have an outdated udev package with bogus udev.rules? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
