On 20 February 2014 23:10, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > Well, except that still leaves a bunch of errors in the kernel log, and > I have to remember to ignore them:-/
Just for few releases, before this patchset goes in. > It'd be nice if the cpufreq core didn't keep changing its behaviour and > adding new error prints. It really should be up to the cpufreq drivers > to log the errors if they experience any. Hmm... not sure.. Its better to do error prints at a single place, i.e. cpufreq core on behalf of all drivers. If there is a error being returned from some routine, we better print a message for that. Rather than living in the illusion that everything is fine :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
