On Thu, Feb 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:48 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 11_ide_drive_sleeping_fix.patch
> > >
> > >       ide_drive_t.sleeping field added.  0 in sleep field used to
> > >       indicate inactive sleeping but because 0 is a valid jiffy
> > >       value, though slim, there's a chance that something can go
> > >       weird.  And while at it, explicit jiffy comparisons are
> > >       converted to use time_{after|before} macros.
> 
> Same question as for "add ide_hwgroup_t.polling" patch.
> AFAICS drive->sleep is either '0' or 'timeout + jiffies' (always > 0)

Hmm, what if jiffies + timeout == 0?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to