Le 25/02/2014 10:12, Sachin Kamat a écrit :
On 25 February 2014 14:17, Philippe Rétornaz <philippe.retor...@epfl.ch> wrote:
This fix a regression on non-DT board booted with a DT enabled kernel

Signed-off-by: Philippe Rétornaz <philippe.retor...@epfl.ch>
---
  drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c |    6 ++++++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c 
b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
index 4498a3f..a10c999 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
@@ -167,6 +167,9 @@ int mc13xxx_get_num_regulators_dt(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
         struct device_node *parent;
         int num;

+       if(!pdev->dev.parent->of_node)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
         of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
         parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "regulators");
         if (!parent)
@@ -187,6 +190,9 @@ struct mc13xxx_regulator_init_data 
*mc13xxx_parse_regulators_dt(
         struct device_node *parent, *child;
         int i, parsed = 0;

+       if(!pdev->dev.parent->of_node)
+               return NULL;
+
         of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
         parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "regulators");
         if (!parent)
--
1.7.9.5


Thanks for the patch. I was about to send a similar patch which also
does a little more cleanup.
If you could test it in DT and non-DT modes that would be great. I
attach the diff below. You can
even fold it into your patch if you wish.

It does fix the regression on the non-DT board.
I don't have any DT-enabled board with mc13xxx PMIC so I cannot test the
DT case. I will let you test the DT case & submit the final patch.

Regards,

Philippe



------------------
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
index 4498a3f0733d..bf75fcabfa3c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/mc13xxx-regulator-core.c
@@ -167,8 +167,10 @@ int mc13xxx_get_num_regulators_dt(struct
platform_device *pdev)
         struct device_node *parent;
         int num;

-       of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
-       parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "regulators");
+       if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "regulators");
         if (!parent)
                 return -ENODEV;

@@ -187,8 +189,10 @@ struct mc13xxx_regulator_init_data
*mc13xxx_parse_regulators_dt(
         struct device_node *parent, *child;
         int i, parsed = 0;

-       of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
-       parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "regulators");
+       if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
+               return NULL;
+
+       parent = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "regulators");
         if (!parent)
                 return NULL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to