On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:31:07PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > > Here, lo is going down. > rt->rt6i_dev = lo and rt->rt6i_idev = ethX. > I think we already see dst->dev == dev (==lo) now. > So, I doubt that fix the problem. > > The source of problem is entry (*) which still on routing entry, > not on gc list. And, the owner of entry is not routing table but > unicast/anycast address structure(s). > We need to "kill" active address on the other interfaces. > > *: rt->rt6i_dev = lo and rt->rt6i_idev = ethX
Sorry I don't think this is right. Although lo going down is required to cause those symptoms, it is not the trigger. The problem only occurs when eth0 itself is unregistered. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/