On 02/27/2014 03:30 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:52:54 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/27/2014 02:31 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, something is getting mesed up.
>>>
>>
>> What it *looks* like to me is that we try to nest the cr2 save/restore,
>> which doesn't nest because it is a percpu variable.
>>
>> ... except in the x86-64 case, we *ALSO* save/restore cr2 inside
>> entry_64.S, which makes the stuff in do_nmi completely redundant and
>> there for no good reason.
>
> Peter, look at the code. That percpu cr2 is in a #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> section. That is, it isn't even executed. That's i386 code. The only
> place the cr2 is saved for x86_64 is in entry_64.S.
>
Right, egg on my face. However, I still think it would make more sense
for it to nest the way entry_64.S does if at all possible.
That makes this even more confusing, though. I would still like to see
what happens with the patch I sent Vince.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
