3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pekon Gupta <pe...@ti.com>
commit 980386d2d6d49e0b42f48550853ef1ad6aa5d79a upstream.
Fixes: commit 75d3625e0e86b2d8d77b4e9c6f685fd7ea0d5a96
ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: add DT bindings for OneNAND
OMAP SoC(s) depend on GPMC controller driver to parse GPMC DT child nodes and
register them platform_device for ONENAND driver to probe later. However this
does
not happen if generic MTD_ONENAND framework is built as module
(CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m).
Therefore, when MTD/ONENAND and MTD/ONENAND/OMAP2 modules are loaded, they are
unable
to find any matching platform_device and remain un-binded. This causes on board
ONENAND flash to remain un-detected.
This patch causes GPMC controller to parse DT nodes when
CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=y || CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m
Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pe...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_nand_child(struct
}
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND)
static int gpmc_probe_onenand_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct device_node *child)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
