Hey Rob-
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:56:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Georgi Djakov <gdja...@mm-sol.com> wrote:
> > +- reg-names: Should contain the following:
> > + "hc_mem" - Host controller register map
> > + "core_mem" - SD Core register map
>
> reg-names should not be required and the order specified by the binding.
>
> > +- interrupts: Should contain an interrupt-specifiers for the interrupts
> > listed in interrupt-names.
> > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the following:
> > + "hc_irq" - Host controller interrupt
> > + "pwr_irq" - PMIC interrupt
>
> Same for interrupt-names.
Could you elaborate on this a bit? I can understand not modifying an
existing binding to make {reg,interrupt}-names required, but for
completely new bindings, why is this a problem?
Not allowing a binding to require these properties renders
platform_get_{resource,irq}_byname() useless for drivers which
exclusively use DT for enumeration. It also makes it impossible to make
a reg entry optional (although, there probably isn't a good usecase for
this).
Thanks,
Josh
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
