On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# fs/binfmt_elf.c # 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] +43 -19 # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c #
I think so. For a short period we applied this patch to the Gentoo 2.6.10 kernel...
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources/release-10.01/dist/1900_umem_catch.patch
...but removed it once users complained it stopped kylix binaries from running.
Bah. That's what happens when you fix stuff.
What's kylix? The Borland C++ builder thing?
Rather Delphi (== Object Pascal) thing.
How should one set about reproducing this problem?
IIRC, Some minimal "personal" version can be downloaded from borland.com.
Grzegorz Kulewski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
