On 03/07/2014 04:10 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coque...@st.com> wrote:From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavall...@st.com> This patch adds a new logic inside the st pinctrl to manage an unsupported scenario: some sysconfig are not available! This is the case of STiH407 where, although documented, the following registers from SYSCFG_FLASH have been removed from the SoC. SYSTEM_CONFIG3040 Output Enable pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions and SYSTEM_ CONFIG3050 Pull Up pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions Without managing this condition an imprecise external abort will be detect. To do this the patch also reviews the st_parse_syscfgs and other routines to manipulate the registers only if actually available. In any case, for example the st_parse_syscfgs detected an error condition but no action was made in the st_pctl_probe_dt. Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@st.com> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavall...@st.com>Hm this does not apply to my tree at all. It appears this is not a stand-alone, patch, so it depends on some other patch to pinctrl-sti?
Yes, it depends on patch 2 of the series (which is based on v3.14-rc4). This is my mistake, the title of patch 2 is wrong: ARM: STi: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC Should be: pinctrl: st: add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC I will resend the pinctrl patches rebased on your tree. Thanks, Maxime
Yours, Linus Walleij
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
