On 07/03/14 15:05, David Herrmann wrote:

> If you can take these two patches, that's fine. They're not strictly
> needed by the series and I'd be happy to see them upstream. The other
> sysfb patches should be merged together, so I don't think there's much
> gain in applying them through fbdev.

Ok, I've applied them to fbdev tree.

> The DRM tree is usually merged late, anyway, so I'll see whether we
> will merge simpledrm through drm-next or not. If not, it'll be 3.16
> then. If you can get the fbdev merge in early, that should be enough
> for us to figure it out and provide a conflict-resolution. Btw., do
> you want the generic sysfb-helper in drivers/video/ or
> driver/video/fbdev? It's not limited to fbdev, so I'd put it in
> drivers/video/.

With a quick glance, it doesn't seem to depend on fbdev in any way,
right? That makes me think drivers/video/.

 Tomi


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to