On 7 Mar 2014 at 11:08, beh...@converseincode.com wrote:

> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> index c3eb102..5ce1f67 100644
> --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static inline void destroy_params(const struct 
> kernel_param *params,
>  /* The macros to do compile-time type checking stolen from Jakub
>     Jelinek, who IIRC came up with this idea for the 2.4 module init code. */
>  #define __param_check(name, p, type) \
> +     static inline type *__check_##name(void) __attribute__ ((unused)); \
>       static inline type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }

why can't you have the attr on the definition itself:

static inline __unused type *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to