I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
As usual forgot this:
Signed-off-by: Patrick Gefre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patrick Gefre wrote:
I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote:
Latest version with review mods: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
- still not __iomem annotations.
I *think* I have this right ??
- still a ->remove method
more comments (mostly nipicks I missed last time, nothing too exciting):
+#define DEVICE_NAME_DYNAMIC "ttyIOC0" /* need full name for misc_register */
this one is completely unused.
+#define PENDING(_p) readl(&(_p)->ip_mem->sio_ir) & _p->ip_ienb
probably wants some braces around the macro body
+static struct ioc4_port *get_ioc4_port(struct uart_port *the_port) +{ + struct ioc4_control *control = dev_get_drvdata(the_port->dev); + int ii; + + if (control) { + for ( ii = 0; ii < IOC4_NUM_SERIAL_PORTS; ii++ ) { + if (!control->ic_port[ii].icp_port) + continue; + if (the_port == control->ic_port[ii].icp_port->ip_port) + return control->ic_port[ii].icp_port; + } + } + return (struct ioc4_port *)0;
just return NULL here.
+static irqreturn_t ioc4_intr(int irq, void *arg, struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + struct ioc4_soft *soft; + uint32_t this_ir, this_mir; + int xx, num_intrs = 0; + int intr_type; + int handled = 0; + struct ioc4_intr_info *ii; + + soft = (struct ioc4_soft *)arg; + if (!soft) + return IRQ_NONE; /* Polled but no ioc4 registered */
no need to cast. and it can't be NULL either.
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); + wake_up_interruptible(&info->delta_msr_wait); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
no need to lock around a wake_up()
+ /* Start up the serial port */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); + retval = ic4_startup_local(the_port); + if (retval) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); + return retval; + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); + return 0;
what about just
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); retval = ic4_startup_local(the_port); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags); return reval;
?
+ struct ioc4_port *port = get_ioc4_port(the_port);
+ unsigned long port_flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ ioc4_change_speed(the_port, termios, old_termios);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->ip_lock, port_flags);
+ return;
no need for empty returns at the end of void functions
+static struct uart_driver ioc4_uart = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .driver_name = "ioc4_serial", + .dev_name = DEVICE_NAME, + .major = DEVICE_MAJOR, + .minor = DEVICE_MINOR, + .nr = IOC4_NUM_CARDS * IOC4_NUM_SERIAL_PORTS, + .cons = NULL, +};
no need to initialize .cons to zero, the compiler does that for you.
+ if ( !request_region(tmp_addr, sizeof(struct ioc4_mem), "sioc4_mem")) {
superflous space before the !
+ if (!request_irq(pdev->irq, ioc4_intr, SA_SHIRQ, + "sgi-ioc4serial", (void *)soft)) { + control->ic_irq = pdev->irq; + } else { + printk(KERN_WARNING + "%s : request_irq fails for IRQ 0x%x\n ", + __FUNCTION__, pdev->irq); + }
Can the driver work without an irq?
Not in its current state.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
