Because I don't think droping it is meaningful, since it will be used. Moreover, the symbol never affect other architectures or subsystems. I feel that is not good to brother people to process the unimportant patch.
Best, Lennox 2014-03-09 4:00 GMT+08:00 Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>: > Lennox, > > On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 14:34 +0800, Lennox Wu wrote: >> According to my record, I had told you we have another >> processor(2013/11/4), hence, we need the parameter. >> We just wirte it done first. Do you remember it? > > In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/76 I already reported that this > Kconfig symbol was unused. Why can't it be dropped and re-added when > code is added to the tree that actually uses it? > > > Paul Bolle > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
