On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:51:12PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:01:16PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Hi Jean, > > > > I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that "Wireless > > Extension v17" > > is a critical feature. > > You are right, it's not critical, and I was already thinking > of not pushing WE-18 to you (the WPA update). I'll stop updating 2.4.X > with respect to wireless, the patches will be available on my web page > for people who needs it.
Please dont miss bugfixes for present functionality. Gracias. > We may revisit this if there is a public > outcry... OK! > > It seems more appropriate to declare it as 2.6 functionality ? > > There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people > to upgrade, I guess... Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense loads more gracefully, handles highmem decently, LSM/SELinux, etc, etc... IMO everyone should upgrade whenever appropriate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
