On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:32:53 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Two cps in parallel managed to stall the the ext4 fs. It seems that > journal code is either waiting for locks or sleeping waiting for > something to happen. This seems similar to what Mike observed on ext3, > here is his description: > > |With an -rt kernel, and a heavy sync IO load, tasks can jam > |up on journal locks without unplugging, which can lead to > |terminal IO starvation. Unplug and schedule when waiting > |for space. > > This is on v3.2-RT. This cp testcase triggers about once in four runs. > It did not trigger once in 20 runs on v3.12-RT. > This brings me to the question: could it been fixed in the meantime and > we not need the jbd patches in latest -RT is there a better testcase? I'm a little confused. Is this only needed for 3.12-rt? I see that you did not mark it for stable. -- Steve > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> > --- > fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c > index 16a698b..c6443c3 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c > +++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ void __jbd2_log_wait_for_space(journal_t *journal) > if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT) > return; > write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + if (current->plug) > + io_schedule(); > mutex_lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex); > > /* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
