On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 21:56 +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache is only called by __init init_hfsplus_fs
>
I think that it is the reasonable fix. Looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <sl...@dubeyko.com>
Thanks,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <f...@skynet.be>
> ---
> fs/hfsplus/attributes.c | 2 +-
> fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/attributes.c b/fs/hfsplus/attributes.c
> index 0f47890..caf89a7 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/attributes.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/attributes.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>
> static struct kmem_cache *hfsplus_attr_tree_cachep;
>
> -int hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache(void)
> +int __init hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache(void)
> {
> if (hfsplus_attr_tree_cachep)
> return -EEXIST;
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> index 08846425b..bb75586 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ typedef int (*search_strategy_t)(struct hfs_bnode *,
> */
>
> /* attributes.c */
> -int hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache(void);
> +int __init hfsplus_create_attr_tree_cache(void);
> void hfsplus_destroy_attr_tree_cache(void);
> hfsplus_attr_entry *hfsplus_alloc_attr_entry(void);
> void hfsplus_destroy_attr_entry(hfsplus_attr_entry *entry_p);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
