On Tuesday 11 March 2014 10:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> > wrote: > >>>> + -- reg-names : Names for the above register regions. The name >>>> to be >>>> + used is as follows: >>>> + - "config" : Queue configuration region. >>>> + - "status" : Queue status RAM. >>>> + - "region" : Descriptor memory setup region. >>>> + - "push" : Queue Management/Queue Proxy region. >>>> + - "pop" : Queue Management/Queue Proxy region. >>>> + - "peek" : Queue Peek region. >>> >>> reg-names should be optional. Also you have the order different from >>> reg. Be consistent as to what is the correct order. >>> >> We thought of using reg-names to remove the ordering to index >> the regs. So if we make the reg-names optional, then indexing >> by order will be used. We can do that. > > We keep having this conversation, why does reg-names need to be optional for > new bindings? > I guess the question is for Rob.
Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
