On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 08:24:20AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 05:41 -0700, tip-bot for Jason Low wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> > index e6d646b..82dad2c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> > @@ -403,9 +403,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state,
> > unsigned int subclass,
> > if (!mutex_can_spin_on_owner(lock))
> > goto slowpath;
> >
> > + mcs_spin_lock(&lock->mcs_lock, &node);
> > for (;;) {
> > struct task_struct *owner;
> > - struct mcs_spinlock node;
>
> Hi Peter, Ingo,
>
> The "struct mcs_spinlock node" still needs to be moved to the beginning
> of __mutex_lock_common() right?
Crud; I thought I fixed that since you pointed that out the last time.
Anyway; later patches make the argument go away, so its a bisect fail at
worst, not sure that's worth fixing at this point :/
sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
