From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf() could overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> --- drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c index 48f76bc..c2e390e 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt) mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt); mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu); - sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu); + snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu); evt->name = mevt->name; evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu); -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
