On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <[email protected]> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected], "Ingo Molnar" <[email protected]>, > > "Frederic Weisbecker" <[email protected]>, > > "Andrew Morton" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument > > > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400 > > Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data). > > > > > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to > > > tracepoint callbacks" > > > CC: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > > > CC: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> > > > CC: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > > > No signed-off-by. > > Hi Steven, > > I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial > patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous > commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ? > Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ? > I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added their signed-off-by to. In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to be missing from this patch. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
